
Advocates
fret about heating assistance
By Todd Ruger
Quad City Times (Davenport, IA)
Augsut 24, 2002
National economic woes and the possibility of reduced funding for
a federal heating-assistance program could combine to reduce the
amount of aid given to Quad City households this winter, program
advocates say.
Agencies who register households for the Low Income Home Energy
Assistance Program, or LIHEAP, do not expect a change in the recent
annual trend of increasing application numbers, said David Fox,
the communications director for the Campaign for Home Energy Assistance.
And President George Bushs budget request for the fiscal
year listed $1.4 billion nationwide for the program, down from the
$1.7 billion earmarked for the program last year, Fox said.
As more people try to get a piece of a very small pie, youre
getting slivers, not pieces, he added.
If the program is not funded at the $1.7 billion level, Iowa stands
to lose $5.6 million of the $31.3 million share it received last
year, he said.
Even if the same number of Iowa households participate, he said,
that reduction would mean assistance money given directly
to the energy companies to relieve higher heating bills during the
winter will fall from $220 per household per winter to $190.
Illinois stands to lose $17.4 million of the $97 million it got
a year ago if the program is not funded at last years level,
Fox said.
Illinois works on a first-come, first-served basis. That means
of the 280,510 households receiving assistance last year, the state
would not be able to assist about 49,500, he said.
Iowa East Central TRAIN, which registers households for the program
in Scott, Clinton, Muscatine and Cedar counties, has seen the number
of households increase 28 percent since the winter of 2000-2001,
assistant operations manager Karen Lueders said.
Last year, 7,563 households in the four counties received more
than $1.4 million in assistance to help pay energy bills, she added.
In both Iowa and Illinois, a household qualifies if its income
falls below 150 percent of the poverty level for the area, depending
upon the number of people in the household.
|